Scenario · Robotics

Robotics demonstrations into deployment decisions

A robotics manufacturer had attracted demonstration requests without a clear route into funded automation work. We defined an application qualification standard, equipped integrators and agreed pilot evaluation criteria with the customer's operating sponsor.

Client
Leading robotics organization
Sub-industry
Robotics
Engagement
Embedded
Pillars
Assembled · Growth
Window
6 months
+75%
Funded deployment decisions

4 → 7

+40%
Qualified application assessments

20 → 28

+5 pp
Assessment-to-deployment conversion

20% → 25%

6 months
Measurement window

Comparable reporting periods

The situation

A robotics manufacturer had attracted demonstration requests without a clear route into funded automation work.

The work focused on funded deployment decisions, qualified application assessments, assessment-to-deployment conversion. Only signed funded deployments counted. Demonstrations and integrator assessments were earlier stages; the figures make no productivity or safety claim.

Which activity helped funded deployment decisions, and what happened at the next decision?

The commercial question

What we did

Three moves, in order.

  • Sharpen

    Define the commercial outcome

    The priority was funded deployment decisions. The team used qualified application assessments and assessment-to-deployment conversion to assess the next stages, with a clear distinction between activity and accepted outcomes.

  • Author / Architect

    Build the path to the next decision

    We defined an application qualification standard, equipped integrators and agreed pilot evaluation criteria with the customer's operating sponsor.

  • Generate / Gain

    Review progress against consistent measures

    The team compared funded deployment decisions, qualified application assessments, assessment-to-deployment conversion across the agreed reporting periods. Only signed funded deployments counted. Demonstrations and integrator assessments were earlier stages; the figures make no productivity or safety claim.

What changed

Funded deployment decisions moved from 4 to 7. Qualified application assessments moved from 20 to 28. Assessment-to-deployment conversion moved from 20% to 25%.

Only signed funded deployments counted. Demonstrations and integrator assessments were earlier stages; the figures make no productivity or safety claim.

We calculated relative changes from the baseline and comparison values and reported conversion or retention changes in percentage points. We rounded displayed changes to one decimal place where needed. The figures did not establish that marketing caused the outcome.

Measurement window: Two six-month opportunity cohorts, each allowed six more months for deployment decisions.

Robotics industry photograph
Where this sat in the system
01–02

Strategic

03–04

Assembled

Core
05–06

Growth

Core

Services in this example
Positioning & Messaging Creative & Content Development Digital Experiences Segmentation & Targeting Outbound Marketing Data-Driven Optimization Account-Based Marketing

Related reading

Explore the robotics growth system.

Next step

Same problem?

If your budget conversation runs on impressions, that is the first thing we would fix.